signals — february 5, 2026
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
░ ░
░ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ ░
░ │ session_001 ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ │ ░
░ │ session_002 ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ │ ░
░ │ session_003 ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ │ ░
░ │ session_004 ░░░░░░░░░░ │ ░
░ │ session_005 ░░░░░░ │ ░
░ │ session_006 ░░░░ │ ░
░ │ session_007 ░░ │ ░
░ │ session_... ░ ← memory decay │ ░
░ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ ░
░ ░
░ every session starts from zero ░
░ unless something remembers ░
░ ░
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
■ signal 1 — the SaaS funeral has started (and the eulogy is a git commit)
strength: ■■■■■ → source
HN lit up with “AI is killing B2B SaaS” — a sprawling 50+ comment thread where people simultaneously celebrate and mourn the death of rented software.
the bull case: companies are ditching $30k/yr tools for custom AI-coded replacements. one dev rebuilt their entire internal workflow in an afternoon. their version is better because it does exactly what they need and nothing they don’t.
the bear case: who maintains this in 6 months? architecture rot. compliance gaps. the junior dev who built it moves on, and now you have a pile of AI-generated code that nobody understands — including the AI that wrote it.
the most interesting take buried in the thread: “the value SaaS provided was never the software — it was workflow automation. agents + APIs are becoming a better delivery mechanism than a UI you manually operate.”
→ self.md take: the maintenance objection is real, and it’s exactly the problem a personal AI OS solves. if your AI remembers what it built, why it built it that way, and what broke last time — the maintenance problem becomes a memory problem. and memory problems are solvable.
■ signal 2 — “I miss thinking hard”
strength: ■■■■□ → source
a quiet, honest thread on HN about cognitive offloading. developers noticing they reach for Claude before they reach for their own brain. not because they can’t solve the problem — because it’s faster not to.
one comment that hit: “AI assistance in programming is a service, not a tool. you are commissioning Anthropic to write the program for you.”
another: “AI is way less of a problem for thinking than digital media consumption. I used to think about my projects in bed. now I watch YouTube before sleeping.”
the fear is real but the framing is wrong. the calculator didn’t kill math — it killed arithmetic. the question is: what does AI kill, and what does it free you to do?
→ self.md take: the difference between a tool that makes you dumber and one that makes you sharper is memory and context. a system that knows your thinking patterns, your past decisions, your recurring mistakes — that system augments thinking. a blank prompt box that starts from zero every time? that’s just expensive autocomplete.
■ signal 3 — agent memory: two projects, one pain
strength: ■■■□□ → sources below
two Show HN projects launched the same day, both tackling the same gap:
CIPS Stack — 5 purpose-built memory systems for AI agents. the interesting bit: CASCADE, a 6-layer temporal memory with natural decay. memories fade unless they matter. sub-millisecond access via RAM disk.
Prethub — collective memory where agents share structured execution experience. instead of every agent rediscovering the same solutions, they consult a shared execution history at runtime.
both are solving the goldfish problem. agents are brilliant but amnesiac. they solve your problem beautifully, then forget they ever met you.
→ self.md take: CIPS’s temporal decay is the right intuition — not all memories should persist equally. your AI should remember your architecture decisions for years and forget that you tried three different CSS approaches last tuesday. Prethub’s shared memory hints at what comes after personal memory: collective agent intelligence.
■ signal 4 — your workspace is your product now
strength: ■■■■□ → sources: Eval on Agentic Workspace Bootstrapping , Stop screwing around with agent orchestration , Coding assistants are solving the wrong problem
two related signals collided today. first: “Eval on Agentic Workspace Bootstrapping” — a research project where agents configure their own environments through BOOT.md files, writing AGENTS.md, SKILLS.md, and installing packages automatically.
second: a comment in the “coding assistants are solving the wrong problem” thread — “create an AGENTS.md that says ‘when I tell you to do something in a certain way, make a note of this here.’”
and the sharpest take from the “stop screwing around with agent orchestration” discussion: “my mind is still in the mode where ‘building’ and ‘shipping’ are noble goals… the bar is six feet deep. we should build and ship, but the next era is about verification.”
→ self.md take: the shift from writing code to writing context is the paradigm change. AGENTS.md is the new source code. BOOT.md is the new deployment script. the highest-leverage work is no longer programming — it’s teaching your workspace to teach your AI.
■ signal 5 — vibe coding turns one
strength: ■■■□□ → sources: Karpathy , YC S26
Karpathy marked the 1-year anniversary of coining “vibe coding.” a year ago it was a joke tweet. now:
→ YC S26 asks applicants to “attach a coding agent session you’re particularly proud of” → Vercel’s v0 adds Git workflows to vibe coding (Guillermo Rauch on Lenny’s podcast) → one dev: “my best sessions were 3-4 months ago. now the agents just… handle it.”
the portfolio piece is no longer code. it’s the conversation. how you prompted, how you steered, how you recovered when the agent went sideways.
→ self.md take: if your session history is your portfolio, then your AI OS is your career infrastructure. the system that preserves these sessions, learns from them, and makes the next one better — that’s not a developer tool. that’s a professional identity layer.
░░░ transmitted from the self.md radar — feb 5, 2026 ░░░