Saner AI

the cognitive load problem

Saner AI targets a specific user: knowledge workers with ADHD who accumulate information faster than they organize it. notes scattered across apps, emails needing responses, calendar chaos, ideas recorded then forgotten. the standard productivity tool response is “better organization”—folders, tags, categories, systems. but organization itself requires executive function. when that’s compromised, productivity tools become shame repositories.

saner’s approach: eliminate manual organization entirely. you capture information (voice notes, text, quick saves via chrome extension), and the “skai” AI assistant automatically tags, categorizes, and connects related content. no filing decisions. no taxonomy design. just capture and let automation handle structure.

the pitch positions saner as “your second brain” or “jarvis for knowledge work.” not a note-taking app but a personal AI that learns your patterns and proactively surfaces relevant information. the difference between passive storage and active assistance—a system that doesn’t wait for queries but checks in and suggests next actions.

the architecture

saner combines note storage, AI processing, and multi-app integration. the core capability is semantic search: ask “what was that article about neural networks I saved last month?” in natural language and saner finds it, even if you never mentioned “neural networks” in the note. traditional keyword search requires remembering how you filed things. semantic search understands intent.

voice capture removes the typing barrier. record thoughts via mobile app and saner transcribes, then organizes automatically. critical for ADHD users where friction in capture means ideas never get recorded. reduce activation energy from “open app, find note, type” to “press button, speak.”

integration with google drive, gmail, slack, and calendar pulls information from existing tools into unified search. instead of context switching between apps to remember where you saved something, query saner and it searches everywhere. the single interface that reduces app-switching overhead—major source of executive function drain.

focus mode provides distraction-free interface for deep work. combined with automatic organization and unified search, the tool aims to reduce the cognitive load that makes knowledge work exhausting. less deciding where to put things, less searching for lost information, less context switching between tools.

who uses it

explicitly designed for ADHD users, but useful for anyone experiencing information overload. researchers organizing academic notes, entrepreneurs managing multiple projects, content creators capturing inspiration, professionals drowning in meeting notes and action items. the “too much information, inadequate organization” problem crosses industries.

pricing starts at $8/month for starter plan (extended voice recording, 30 AI messages/day, 5GB storage), $16/month for standard (unlimited recordings, 100GB, full AI access). free tier exists but with 1-minute voice recording limit—too restrictive for real usage. the positioning: cheaper than hiring assistant, cheaper than multiple specialized productivity tools, costs less than time lost searching for information.

testimonials emphasize “reclaiming hours weekly” from reduced search time and better information accessibility. standard productivity tool marketing but relevant claim—if you spend 30 minutes daily searching for things you wrote down, even modest improvement has measurable value.

the limitations

beta status means bugs and incomplete features. reports of chrome extension lag, mobile app lacking full feature parity with web, occasional sync issues. the standard early-stage software problems. early adopters tolerate in exchange for cutting-edge capabilities and (presumably) responsive development team incorporating feedback.

requires internet connection for AI features. voice transcription, content organization, and semantic search happen server-side. offline mode exists but limited. constrains usage for people working in low-connectivity environments or who need absolute data locality.

dependency on external AI models. saner includes “personal AI skai” but also integrates GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini Pro. unclear which models power which features and what happens when external providers change pricing, deprecate models, or have outages. the integration advantage becomes dependency risk.

most fundamentally: adding another tool to reduce tool complexity. classic productivity app paradox. saner requires learning new interface, migrating existing information, forming new habits. if you fail to use it consistently, it becomes another abandoned productivity system generating guilt. the tool only works if you actually use it.

the market position

saner competes with notion (more powerful, more complex), obsidian (local-first, plugin ecosystem), roam research (bidirectional linking), and various AI note-taking apps. differentiation is explicit ADHD focus—features prioritizing low-friction capture and automatic organization rather than powerful-but-complex customization.

the ADHD angle is smart positioning. existing tools optimize for organization capability, not executive function constraints. saner optimizes for reducing decisions and automation. serving specific underserved niche rather than competing head-on with established players.

market risk: “AI note-taking app” is crowded category. notion added AI features. obsidian has AI plugins. established players can incorporate similar capabilities. saner’s edge is focus—optimizing entire experience for specific user problems rather than bolting AI onto existing architecture. whether that focus creates sufficient differentiation remains open question.

why it matters (or doesn’t)

saner represents AI application to productivity beyond “write better emails” or “summarize documents.” using AI to reduce cognitive load through automatic categorization, proactive suggestions, and natural language interaction—the promise of AI as personal assistant rather than glorified autocomplete.

the ADHD focus highlights how “productivity tools” often assume neurotypical executive function. features requiring consistent organization, delayed gratification (set up systems now, benefit later), and resistance to distraction exclude people those features don’t work for. designing for neurodivergent users produces tools with different tradeoffs—immediacy over power, automation over control, low-friction over comprehensive.

whether saner succeeds commercially, the design principles matter: minimize capture friction, automate organization, surface information proactively, reduce context switching. these improve productivity for everyone, not just ADHD users. tools optimized for cognitive constraints benefit neurotypical users too—just less critical for functionality.

the trajectory

saner’s success depends on delivering consistent enough value that users stick with it. productivity tools have terrible retention—initial enthusiasm fades, habits don’t form, systems get abandoned. saner must become reflexive part of workflow rather than thing you remember to use occasionally.

the beta phase is make-or-break. fix bugs, achieve feature parity across platforms, stabilize performance. early adopters tolerate issues but mainstream users won’t. the product must reach “reliable enough to trust” threshold before broader adoption becomes possible.

competitive pressure from established players adding AI features threatens differentiation. saner needs sufficient lead time and focus advantages to avoid getting commoditized. the niche positioning (ADHD-specific) provides defensibility but limits addressable market. whether that tradeoff works determines survival.

if saner achieves product-market fit with ADHD users, expansion to broader knowledge worker market becomes viable. “built for ADHD, works for everyone” positioning. but must nail core audience first before expanding. premature generalization dilutes focus that creates initial value.

whether saner becomes category leader, gets acquired, or fades as bigger players copy features, the design principles persist. AI-powered automatic organization, natural language interaction, low-friction capture—these patterns work. someone captures this value. whether that’s saner depends on execution, timing, and luck.

→ related: granola